Cases 11 - 20 of 584
Soto v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05025
Petitioner:
Kyle Garrett Soto
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ford v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Justin D Ford
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Levac v. Haney et al
as 6:2024cv06047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Sarah Haney, Sheriff Travis Hill, Sheriff Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Barr v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Lord Judah Al-Barr
Defendant:
USA and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Brown v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
George Eli Brown
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Levac v. Haney et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney, Travis Hill, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frazier Todd, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fongers v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mitchell Fongers
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
