Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Bankston et al v. Sheppard et al
as 3:2022cv05033
Plaintiff:
Jenna Bankston and Randy Bankston
Defendant:
Travis Sheppard, Sheriff Robert Evenson, Roy Rivard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 4:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Everett Henderson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Douglass McCoy, Davinder Hayreh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Texas Roadhouse Inc et al
as 4:2021cv01183
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sheppard
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Inc, Jonathan Walsh and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ivicsics et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00675
Plaintiff:
EVELYN JEANNETTE BARGER, Carmela Lopez, Diane Williams and others
Defendant:
. DOE MANUFACTURERS 1-100, C. R. BARD, INC., SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheppard v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2021cv00977
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kerry Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Robbie Amburgey, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3634
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jesse Spears, Thomas Williams, Ronald Carmouche and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Amburgey et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02219
Plaintiff:
James Partridge, Anthony Dibenedetto, Nathan Tuner and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Dennis v. Graves et al
as 4:2020cv01017
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dennis
Defendant:
William Straughn, Rodney Ford, Cynthia Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02826
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
