Cases 11 - 20 of 941
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Brothers et al
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Brain Brothers, Short Wilson, Nick Gault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Claudine Shannon
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Boals v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Taylor Boals
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffen, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon Hollie v. Essentia Health, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Hollie
Defendant:
Essentia Health, Moose Lake Clinic, Benjamin Marsh, Medical Doctor, Essentia Health; in their Official and Individual Capacities and Jane/John Does, Unknown Individuals; in their Official and Individual Capacities
United States v. Colby Shannon, Jr.
as 24-1227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Colby Lakeith Shannon, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Shannon v. Williams
as 6:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Darrius Shannon
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Shannon Smalley
as 24-1149
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Shannon Smalley
Dorsey et al v. Columbia Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv04010
Plaintiff:
Emmit Dorsey and Deshonda Shannon
Defendant:
Columbia Police Department, Tanner Gillispie, Kyle Whitmire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
