Cases 21 - 30 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mann v. Quiktrip Corporation
as 4:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Mann
Defendant:
Quiktrip Corporation doing business as Quiktrip and Quiktrip Corporation doing business as Quiktrip #644
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Starr et al
as 0:2022cv02315
Petitioner:
Lakisha Smith
Respondent:
Mistell Starr, Dr. Reyna, Mr. Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel Mann v. Doug Clark, Warden, et al
as 22-2750
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent / Appellee:
Doug Clark, Warden, SDSP and Attorney General of South Dakota
Miner v. Turnkey Medical Co et al
as 4:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Miner
Defendant:
Turnkey Medical Co, Antwan Carter, Savannah Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rauch v. Precythe et al
as 5:2022cv06085
Plaintiff:
Mike Rauch
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Jeff Norman, Christopher Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
FCCI Insurance Company v. Mann et al
as 5:2022cv05063
Plaintiff:
FCCI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey D Mann, Andrea L Mann and A&J Plumbing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
