Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Armstrong v. Target Corporation et al
as 0:2010cv01340
Plaintiff:
Anthony Armstrong
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Minneapolis Police Department and Stoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. Hollaway et al
as 2:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mark R Davis
Defendant:
Walter Hollaway, Anthony Thomas, Kelly Wendy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leiferman et al v. Estate of Judith Stoll et al
as 0:2009cv02976
Plaintiff:
Troy Leiferman, Troy Leiferman, Troy Leiferman and others
Defendant:
Estate of Judith Stoll, Estate of Judith Stoll, Joseph A. Girardi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Stoll-Miner v Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tracey Kay Stoll-Miner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. K Johnson Contruction, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv04900
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company and Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
K Johnson Contruction, Inc., Edward E Stoll, Pike Creek Contracting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gieselman v. Desoto, City of et al
as 4:2007cv01510
Plaintiff:
Gary J. Gieselman
Defendant:
Desoto, City of, Unknown Krauss, Unknown Mungesper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfred Flowers v. City of Minneapolis, et al
as 07-2705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alfred Flowers
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, Kevin Stoll, in his individual and official capacities, Sherry Appledorn, in her individual and official capacities and others
Harrison v. Brown et al
as 6:2007cv03053
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Harrison
Defendant:
Michele Brown, Lea White, Cassandra White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
