Cases 21 - 30 of 540
Christians v. Hanvey et al
as 4:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Christians
Defendant:
Joe Hanvey, Kellie Wasko, Alyssa Welbig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Chase v. Dan Sullivan, et al
as 23-3007
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathan Chase
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Dan Sullivan, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Brandt v. Dickerson et al
as 4:2023cv00620
Plaintiff:
Donna R Brandt
Defendant:
Terrace Dickerson, Grant, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02545
Plaintiff:
Karen Sullivan
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Barajas v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger, Christy Biddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shanklin v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Janet Shanklin
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Steven M. Ebert and Evan P. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Sullivan
as 0:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Ryan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Tarver v. Clark et al
as 4:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Jason Tarver
Defendant:
Danny Clark, Linda Henderson, Melanie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Huggins Metal Finishing, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Candice Smith and Candice L. Smith
Defendant:
Huggins Metal Finishing, Inc. and Huggins Metal Finishing, Inc. doing business as Sullivan Precision Metal Finishing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
