Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Brantley et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2010cv02068
Plaintiff:
Laudies D Brantley, Jr , Geneva Brantley , Brantley Farming Company and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Inc , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brantley v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv02184
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Brantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Munlake Contractors, Inc. et al v. Brantley Developments, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv01109
Plaintiff:
Munlake Contractors, Inc. and Berkley Regional Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brantley Developments, LLC and Eagle Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Via v. Brantley et al
as 6:2010cv06001
Plaintiff:
John L. Via
Defendant:
Floyd Brantley, Ron Adams, T. Hipple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02578
Plaintiff:
Gerald D. Anderson, Gerald D. Anderson, Gerald D. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Fudge v. Brantley et al
as 5:2007cv00280
Plaintiff:
James C Fudge
Defendant:
Judith Brantley, Carlee Griswold, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Grant Harris, Tim Moncrief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arkansas Times Inc et al v. Norris
as 5:2007cv00195
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Times Inc, Northwest Arkansas Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists and Max Brantley
Defendant:
Larry B Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
