Cases 41 - 50 of 2,501
Chris White v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1352
Petitioner:
Chris White
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, in his official capacity
Peter Allan, Sr., et al v. Minnesota DHS, et al
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr., Russell Hatton, Michael D. Benson and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Marshall Smith, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Director of Direct Care and Treatment for the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Bahtuoh et al v. White et al
as 0:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dineaa Bahtuoh and Derrick DaSean Holliday
Defendant:
Jeffrey White and Kathryn Halverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. White Hall School District et al
as 4:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Henry Maxwell, Jr
Defendant:
White Hall School District, Lyndzey Hegwood, Lindsey Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
White v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Matthew J White
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
White v. Van Loo
as 5:2024cv06020
Petitioner:
Larry White
Respondent:
Brock Van Loo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Immel v. Robertson et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Immel
Defendant:
Sheila Robertson and Jacob White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferry v. Ross et al
as 5:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Ferry
Defendant:
Lieutenant Tyler Ross, Deputy Cain, Deputy White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
