Cases 51 - 60 of 3,936
Fowler v. Culclager et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Chad Anthony Louis Fowler
Defendant:
Aundrea Culclager, Smith and Ashley Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Anthony Steven Wright
Defendant:
State of Iowa and Iowa Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Anthony Deberry
as 24-1661
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Charles Deberry
Moore v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections and The Bureau of Criminal Apprehensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrill v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Jack Anthony Merrill
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Villebrun v. Nienaber
as 0:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Anthony Randal-Ashley Villebrun
Defendant:
Brandon Keith Nienaber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McSweeney v. Howe et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McSweeney
Defendant:
Kyle Howe, City of Toledo, Iowa, Anthony Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
