Cases 51 - 60 of 1,445
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Valerie Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Barefield v. Rondoni et al
as 6:2023cv06094
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Sgt. Oscar Rondoni, Program Warden Tasha Griffin, Deputy Warden Randy Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alan Woods v. State of Minn. Corp. Courts
as 23-2870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alan Woods
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota Corporate Courts
Woods v. Singleton et al
as 4:2023cv04080
Plaintiff:
Earl Spencer Woods, Jr
Defendant:
James Singleton, Captain James Wise, Officer Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. U.S. District Clerk of Court et al
as 4:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Gene E Dudley
Defendant:
U.S. District Court Clerk, Gloria Woods and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
