Cases 71 - 80 of 1,861
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Sarah Huckabee, Arkansas Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00266
Petitioner:
Raymond Owen
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Combee v. USA
as 4:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Raymond Morris Allen Combee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Conwell v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Raymond Conwell
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Cedar County Jail and Cedar County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Raymond
Defendant:
United States of America and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Woodhouse Chevrolet, Missouri et al
as 5:2023cv04035
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Woodhouse Chevrolet, Missouri, Wells Fargo Bank, Raymond Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Himel v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01588
Plaintiff:
Raymond Himel
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01492
Plaintiff:
Raymond Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Pierce v. USA
as 4:2023cv00315
Petitioner:
Raymond L Pierce
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
