Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jackson v. Universal Pictures
as 4:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Jackson
Defendant:
Universal Pictures
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Hefley v. Redington et al
as 2:2021cv00041
Defendant:
Ernest W. Jackson, Corizon LLC., Cathy Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin J Hefley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hefley v. Redington et al
as 4:2021cv00725
Defendant:
Ernest W. Jackson, Corizon LLC., Cathy Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin J Hefley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Nichols, Jr. v. D.W. Jackson, et al
as 21-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Lay, Warden, Brickey's, East Arkansas Regional Max Unit, D. W. Jackson, Deputy Warden, Brickey's, East Arkansas Regional Max Unit and others
Jackson v. Frakes
as 8:2020cv00458
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jackson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nichols v. Jackson et al
as 2:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Lay, Dexter Payne, D W Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jim Harris v. Corizon LLC, et al
as 20-2489
Defendant / Appellee:
Ernest W. Jackson, Pat Roes, 1-5, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jim R. Harris
Jim Harris v. Ernest Jackson, et al
as 20-2492
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, LLC, Pat Roes, 1-5, R. Eric Bessey, DDS, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jim R. Harris
Harris v. Corizon et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jim Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon, Ian Wallace, George A. Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Campbell et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Cooley
Defendant:
Gary Campbell, Elizabeth Conley, Michael Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
