Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jones v. USA
as 4:2023cv03151
Petitioner:
Walter B. Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walen et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Charles Walen and Paul Henderson
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Alvin Jaeger and Michael Howe
Intervenor Defendant:
Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation, Lisa DeVille and Cesareo Alvarez, Jr.
Petitioner:
North Dakota Legislative Assembly and Terry B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manuel Perez Alvarez v. United States, et al
as 19-1791
Defendant / Appellee:
Correct Care Solutions, League Medical Concepts and United States of America
Defendant:
G. Beasley, Warden, Forrest City FCI, Dallas B. Jones, Warden, Beaumont FCI and Does, Staff and Administration, Forrest City FCI and Beaumont FCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manuel DeJesus Perez Alvarez
Leekley-Winslow v. Fairview Health Services
as 0:2019cv00587
Defendant:
Richard B Jones, State of Minnesota, Fairview Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Colton Leekley-Winslow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. USA et al
as 4:2017cv00731
Plaintiff:
Manuel DeJesus Perez Alvarez
Defendant:
USA, G Beasley, Dallas B Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Ellingson, et al v. Anthony Piercy
as 16-3751
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Craig Ellingson and Sherry Ellingson
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Piercy
Defendant:
Ronald K. Replogle, J. Bret Johnson, Gregory Kindle and others
Randle v. Roberson et al
as 4:2015cv00760
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Laytonya Roberson, B Demenn, B Lcour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
David B Jones and Jones Farm
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
