Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Gunther v. Missouri Department of Mental Health
as 4:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Rex S. Gunther
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Crocker et al
as 2:2023cv02104
Plaintiff:
Chad Allen Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Sheriff Johnny Crocker, Chief Deputy Johnathan Little, Jail Administrator Kateessa McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willform v. Catfish Bend Casino et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Devell Willform, Sr
Defendant:
Catfish Bend Casino, Kehl Family, Randy Winegard, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
White v. Lusk, et al
as 4:2021cv04037
Defendant:
Nevada County, AR, Miller County, Arkansas, Michael Lusk and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Clark v. Floyd Crues, et al
as 21-1610
Defendant / Appellee:
Darnetta Clinkscale, Shane Hopper, Ken Brostrum and others
Defendant:
Amy Hilgerman, Bill Hass, School Service Systems, (SSS) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Hedman Clark
Plaintiff:
Alternative Discipline and Behavioral Concepts (ADBC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gunther v. St. Louis County Police Department
as 4:2020cv01086
Plaintiff:
Rex Gunther and Peter Kroner
Defendant:
St. Louis County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunther v. St. Louis Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center et al
as 4:2020cv00952
Defendant:
St. Louis Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center and Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center
Plaintiff:
Rex S. Gunther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
