Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LADS Network Solutions, Inc. v. Agilis Systems, LLC, et al
as 23-3267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LADS Network Solutions, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC
LADS Network Solutions, Inc. v. Agilis Systems, LLC, et al
as 22-3077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LADS Network Solutions, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC
LADS Network Solutions, Inc. v. Agilis Systems, LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
LADS Network Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Murphy v. Nunley et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
Nunley, Cassy Richardson, Opel Bledso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Auto Insurance Company v. Gates Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
State Auto Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gates Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. and Lads Toy Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyngholm et al v. FedEx Ground et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2011cv00125
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., LAD Trucking, Inc. and Brent R. Mendenhall
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Lyngholm and Linda Lyngholm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tank Tech, Inc. v. Neal
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Tank Tech, Inc. and Tank Tech, Inc.
Defendant:
Lad Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.