Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Guardian Tax MO, LLC v. Love et al
as 4:2021cv01492
Plaintiff:
Guardian Tax MO, LLC
Defendant:
Dennis M. Love, United States of America - Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
White v. Curley et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Walter M. Loving, Downtown Kansas City Community Improvement District and others
Plaintiff:
Denise White
Intervenor:
Mark Randall Draper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Denise M Love
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Goodman
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Denise M Love, Denise Goodman and Wayne Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2016cv00564
Petitioner:
DeAnthony M. Love
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv01024
Plaintiff:
Wanda M Love
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Love v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00752
Plaintiff:
Celeste M. Love
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newberg v. Astrue
as 4:2008cv00967
Plaintiff:
Celeste M. Love Newberg
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
