Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Wright Perrin v. Lott et al
as 4:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
Amy Wright Perrin
Defendant:
Julian Lott, City of Camden and Camden, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-Family & Medical Leave Act
Des Moines Midwife Collective, LLC et al v. Iowa Health Facilities Council et al
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Des Moines Midwife Collective, LLC, Caitlin Hainley and Emily Zambrano-Andrews
Defendant:
Iowa Health Facilities Council, Harold Miller, Aaron DeJong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Owens v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Perrin Amber Owens
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Webster v. Perrin
as 3:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Harold Perrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Ackerman, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-2759
Plaintiff / Appellee:
William Ackerman, Edward Benefield, Abram Garcia and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
Abram Garcia, Dwayne Wynkoop, Edward Benefield and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Perrin et al v. USPS et al
as 4:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Vicki Butrick Koch and Charles Perrin
Defendant:
Sams, US Park Service, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Ray A. Perrin, et al
as 21-1725
Defendant / Appellant:
RAJJ Entertainment Inc., doing business as Tool Shed Lounge and Ray A. Perrin
Defendant:
Michael L. Andrews
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Gary Webster v. Harold Perrin
as 20-3587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant / Appellee:
Harold Perrin, Mayor, Jonesboro
Webster v. Perrin
as 3:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Harold Perrin
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
