Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Stanley v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04223
Plaintiff:
Dairian Eugene Stanley
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Travis Terry, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrell Cross v. Eileen Ramey
as 23-2571
Petitioner / Appellant:
Farrell Wayne Cross
Respondent / Appellee:
Eileen Ramey
gpac LLC v. Ramey LLP
as 4:2023cv04088
Counter Defendant:
gpac LLC
Counter Claimant:
Ramey LLP
Plaintiff:
gpac LLP
Defendant:
Ramey & Schwaller LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ramey v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ramey
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chisum v. United States Government et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ramey Alaine Chisum
Defendant:
United States Government, Social Security Administration, Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
McDonald et al v. Stetson Courier Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Johnny Carroll McDonald, Casey Jackson, Philip Fitzgerald and others
Defendant:
Stetson Courier Inc and John Stetson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ramey v. Parson et al
as 2:2022cv04171
Plaintiff:
Corionsa Ramey
Defendant:
Michael L. Parson, Eric Schmitt and Anne L. Precythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dabbs v. Ramey et al
as 2:2022cv04168
Plaintiff:
Brandon C Dabbs
Defendant:
Eileen Ramey, Earl Scott, Masonda Wheatly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dabbs v. Ramey et al
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Brandon C. Dabbs
Defendant:
Eileen Ramey, Earl Scott, Masonda Wheatly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffry Polk v. Eileen Ramey
as 22-2305
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeffry Alan Polk
Respondent / Appellee:
Eileen Ramey, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
