Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Vance v. Shirbroun et al
as 3:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Dezrien Vance
Defendant:
Darrell Shirbroun and Anne M Sheeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyer Automotive, Inc. v. Kolterman et al
as 4:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Meyer Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
Jessica Kolterman, Brian Peters, John Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vance v. Macro
as 4:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Dezrien Vance
Defendant:
Jesse A. Macro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Mayfield v. Danny Clark, et al
as 23-3603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Timothy Mayfield
Defendant / Appellee:
Danny Clark, Jail Administrator, Sheridan Detention Center, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC and Ray Vance, Sheriff, Grant County
Vance v. Fort Dodge Correctional Facility
as 4:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Dezrien Vance
Defendant:
Fort Dodge Correctional Facility
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Wheeler et al
as 2:2023cv04204
Plaintiff:
Jordan Camron Willis
Defendant:
John P. Wheeler, Vance Ortmeyer, Cole County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Falkenrath
as 4:2023cv01284
Petitioner:
Vance Roy Clark
Respondent:
Superintendent Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vance v. McCown
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Preston Vick Vance, Jr
Defendant:
P McCown, Arkansas Department of Correction, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. James Vance
as 23-1725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Reece Vance
Mayfield v. Sheridan Detention Center
as 4:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Sheridan Detention Center, Danny Clark, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
