Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Daniel Ford, Jr. v. John Stanley, et al
as 23-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Owen Ford, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John Stanley, Sheriff, Lonoke County, William Robert Shipp, Administrator, Lonoke County, T. Smith and others
Ford v. Stanley et al
as 4:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owen Ford, Jr
Defendant:
John Stanley, William Robert Shipp, T Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Roberts v. Saul
as 4:2019cv00782
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
James William Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Leon Johnson, Kayce Green, William Robert Simpson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. William Worrels
as 16-4423
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William Robert Worrels
EEE Minerals, LLC et al v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
EEE Minerals, LLC , Suzanne Vohs , Zoe Koller and others
Defendant:
State of North Dakota , Board of University and School Lands of the State of North Dakota, The , Continental Resources, Inc. and others
Intervenor_defendant:
North Dakota State Engineer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hennen et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02305
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Hennen , Richard R. Lahr , Richard Lahr Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cossens v. Davis
as 0:2014cv01787
Plaintiff:
William Robert Cossens
Defendant:
Jordan Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv04104
Movant:
William Robert Joseph Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
