Cases 111 - 120 of 830,911
Peerless Indemnity Company et al v. Immanuel Baptist Church et al
as 3:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Peerless Indemnity Company and Peerless Insurance Company
Defendant:
Immanuel Baptist Church, Alvin Clark, Fred K. Adkins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk09010
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Strickland v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ryan Strickland
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stedman v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv01779
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Defendant:
Warden Robert S. Dean, Jr., Warden Gregory A Werner and Michelle A Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
United States of America v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew Cole
Garnishee:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Shiprack v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Jessie D. Shiprack
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Moore v. Komatsu America Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
Darrin Moore
Defendant:
Komatsu America Corp. and Amber Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gametronics LLC v. 8Bitdo Technology HK Limited
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Gametronics LLC
Defendant:
8Bitdo Technology HK Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gametronics LLC v. Steelseries ApS
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Gametronics LLC
Defendant:
Steelseries ApS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gametronics LLC v. Mad Catz Global Limited
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Gametronics LLC
Defendant:
Mad Catz Global Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
