Cases 131 - 140 of 831,000
Iliya v. United States Marshalls Service
as 3:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Dauda Iliya
Defendant:
United States Marshalls Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Quiroga et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Major Victor Quiroga and Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00639
Petitioner:
Zachary John Kennedy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Terry v. Payne
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jarell Terry
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ollison v. James et al
as 4:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Ollison, Jr
Defendant:
Darryl James, Jr, Fenisha Moton, Fred Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullen v. Centurion Healthcare et al
as 3:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Allen Pullen
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, T. Bowden and S. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barragan v. De Joy
as 3:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Zocima Maria Barragan
Defendant:
Louis De Joy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CenterWell Health Services, Inc. v. Wright
as 5:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
CenterWell Health Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Paige Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barge-Siever v. Surgical Safety Technologies Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv05221
Plaintiff:
Steven Barge-Siever
Defendant:
Surgical Safety Technologies Inc. and Teodor Grantcharov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
