Cases 111 - 120 of 831,895
Hill v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Brian T. Hill
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Brian Roberts, Richard Jallins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Waters v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 2:2024cv05484
Plaintiff:
Christian Waters
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
ROBERTS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00992
Petitioner:
LEIAH Z. ROBERTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
PARKINSON v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
BRADLEY PARKINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MacDonald #298537 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01584
Petitioner:
Ian A MacDonald
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montogmery #282724 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
Skylar Aiden Montogmery
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Rosas, Unknown Nakay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyams v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
David Hyams
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
v. Green, Tweed & Co.
as 3:2024cv03874
Defendant:
Green, Tweed & Co., Harry L. Brittan and Nancy Brittan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
