Cases 31 - 40 of 1,141
Waggener van Meter v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Megan Waggener van Meter
Defendant:
Mondelez International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Zavala-Perez v. Pacia
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Zavala-Perez
Defendant:
Christina Anne Pacia
Cross Defendant:
Megan Liesegang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Zavala v. Pacia
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Maria Guadalupe Zavala
Cross Plaintiff:
Christina Anne Pacia
Cross Defendant:
Megan Liesegang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ingram v. McMahill et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Aaron Quincy Ingram
Defendant:
Kevin McMahill, A Cordero, O Eduardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
David Carmine Lettieri
Defendant:
T-Mobile, Susan Johnson, Paul E Bunanno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Knights Templar Commandery et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Defendant:
Fredro Starr, Knights Tempar Commandery Zone 12, Southgate, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diamond v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Megan Diamond
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kirby #165484 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirby
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, NaphCare, Ashley Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
