Cases 71 - 80 of 159
Young Yil Jo et al v. Mr. Donald Trump et al
as 2:2019cv09805
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Mr. Eric Garceti, Proland Management and others
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01666
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Archuleta v. Trump et al
as 2:2019cv05502
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Archuleta
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Unknown Party, US District of Utah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Overton v. United States Government et al
as 2:2019cv01858
Defendant:
Donald Trump and United States Government
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Young Yil Jo et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2019cv08687
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Mr. Eric Garceti, Proland Management and others
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Yil Jo et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2019cv07850
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Proland Management, City of Los Angeles California and others
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador Estrada Montero v. Donald Trump et al
as 2:2019cv05039
Defendant:
Abe Japan Primer Ministirs, Offices Anderson, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Salvador Estrada Montero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaefer v. Trump
as 3:2019cv00870
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swartz v. Trump
as 3:2019cv00108
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Michelle Swartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
