Cases 71 - 80 of 291
Reading v. Frauenheim
as 1:2017cv01424
Petitioner:
Aaron Lafoy Reading
Respondent:
Scott Frauenheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reading v. Frauenheim
as 2:2017cv02171
Petitioner:
Aaron Lafoy Reading
Respondent:
Scott Frauenheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Jonathan Read
as 17-10439
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE READ
The ERISA Industry Committee v. Read
as 3:2017cv01605
Defendant:
Tobias Read
Plaintiff:
The ERISA Industry Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Smartstop Asset Management, LLC et al v. Jamie Bennett et al
as 8:2017cv01499
Defendant:
Jamie Bennett, Reade DeCurtins and Does
Plaintiff:
SSTI Canada Acquisitions, LLC and Smartstop Asset Management, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02096
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Enhanced Physical Therapy LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01470
Plaintiff:
American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Enhanced Physical Therapy LLC, Edward R Hunter, Leslie Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Continental Casualty Company et al v. C.D. Stimson Company
as 2:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company and American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
Defendant:
C.D. Stimson Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wayne Spindler v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv00250
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Detective LAPD Nelly Nava-Mercardo and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Spindler
Robert Naehu, Jr. v. Thomas Read
as 1:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
Robert Naehu, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Read and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
