Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Plaintiff:
Duane Roberts, Juventino Sagrero-Perez, Billy Moore and others
Defendant:
Chemours Company, Dynax Corporation, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dimick v. Allstate Corporation, The
as 3:2019cv00262
Defendant:
Julie Anderson, Alaska Bar Association, Simon Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Dimick, Drake William Dimick, Laura Kristine Dimick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. Sportsmans Bar, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00034
Defendant:
SPORTSMAN'S BAR, Sportsmans Bar, Inc, Erin Dawn Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Mercado v. Shawn Williams et al
as 4:2014cv05071
Plaintiff:
Darin W Mercado
Defendant:
Walla Walla County , Shawn Williams, Gerrod A Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shawn Williams v. Steve Franke
as 13-35657
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE FRANKE, Superintendent of Two Rivers Correctional Facility in Umatilla Oregon
Williams v. Hall
as 6:2001cv00812
Respondent:
Stan Czerniak and Guy Hall
Petitioner:
Shawn Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodges v. Pima County Adult Detention Center
as 4:2008cv00578
Plaintiff:
Shawn William Hodges
Defendant:
Pima County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
