Cases 51 - 60 of 936
FOUCH v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02913
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY FOUCH
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and CITIZENS BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
US v. Christopher Sueiro
as 23-4473
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROBERT SUEIRO
US v. Lloyd Carr
as 23-6673
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LLOYD B. CARR, a/k/a Lloyd Carr
Grant v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Willard Dwayne Grant
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Stevens-Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Launi Stevens-Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13138
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROBERTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christopher Robert Lute v. Avery Pye et al
as 2:2023cv04285
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robert Lute
Defendant:
Avery Pye, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward et al v. Reyes
as 8:2023cv01434
Defendant:
Gaston G. Reyes and Gaston Reyes
Plaintiff:
Carrie M. Ward, Howard N. Bierman, Jacob Geesing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SELBY v. NEWPORT BEACH RESORT MOTEL et al
as 1:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
ELAINE SELBY
Defendant:
NEWPORT BEACH RESORT MOTEL, NEWPORT BEACH INVESTMENTS, LLC, JOHN DOES (1-10) (FICTITIOUS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
