Cases 41 - 50 of 625
Jackson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv08424
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jackson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Seyb v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Seyb
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Valdez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Lee Valdez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PRUITT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
BOBBY PRUITT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Bobby Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
TAULBEE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
BOBBI J. TAULBEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv11281
Plaintiff:
Bobbie A. Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Barnett v. SSA
as 5:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Barnett
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Boatman v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Bobby Sue Boatman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cassell v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jo Edwards Cassell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
