Cases 11 - 20 of 1,414
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03884
Plaintiff:
City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension Fund
Defendant:
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc., Timothy P. Herbert and Richard J. Buchholz
United States of America v. Herbert (Brown)
as 24-362
Defendant:
JUSSIAH HERBERT, BRANDON HICKS, JANELL JOHNSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court:
William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner:
CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY LOHMAN, JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS and others
Defendant:
DAVID MIZE, IBRAHIM MUHTASEB, ALYSON DYKES and others
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY LOHMAN and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, A Professional Corporation
Defendant:
JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
