Cases 31 - 40 of 44,588
Ballentine v. Credit One Bank N.A.
as 1:2024cv04710
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jerome Ballentine
Defendant:
Credit One Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RICE et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2024cv02647
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RICE and ERIK WESTERVELT
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
In Re: Request from Turkey
as 1:2024cv00705
Petitioner:
Emine Esra Erandan
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
US v. Omoruyi
as 24-1561
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
OSARETIN GODSPOWER OMORUYI, a/k/a Bright Nelson, a/k/a Nelson Bright
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
US v. Omoruyi
as 24-1562
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
OSAKPAMWAN HENRY OMORUYI, a/k/a Clifford Bernard, a/k/a Bernard Clifford
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Yan v. State Bar of Texas
as 24-10543
Plaintiff:
Conghua Yan
Defendant:
State Bar of Texas, a private company, Barrows Firm, a private company, Leslie Starr Barrows, in Individual Capacity, as Member of the State Bar of Texas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
