Cases 31 - 40 of 481
Gwinnett County, Georgia et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00021
Defendant:
DISH Network L.L.C., DISH Network Corp., Hulu, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gwinnett County, Georgia, City of Brookhaven, Georgia and Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CITY OF FISHERS, INDIANA et al v. NETFLIX, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02351
Defendant:
DISH NETWORK L.L.C., HULU, LLC, NETFLIX, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF FISHERS, INDIANA, CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Farrell v. DirecTV LLC
as 3:2020cv05061
Plaintiff:
John Farrell
Defendant:
DirecTV LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Toni Nash v. Directv, LLC
as 2:2019cv09032
Plaintiff:
Toni Nash
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC. and Directv, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-56002
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TATRO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
