Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 103
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party: National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae: Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant: Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae: the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff: National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association and Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae: the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party: Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant: OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae: SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff: Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant: Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant: Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant: DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
In re: Richard Kaul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1977
Not Yet Classified: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY, CONGRESS OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS and others
Petitioner: In re: RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD
Defendant: LINDY WASHBURN
Smith v. Aroostook County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1340
Interested Party: CLAUDETTE HUMPHREY, PUBLIC HEALTH SCHOLARS and KATAHDIN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER
Petitioner: MAINE ASSOCIATION OF PSYCHIATRIC PHYSICIANS, NOTHERN NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, MAINE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellant: SHAWN D. GILLEN, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Aroostook County and AROOSTOOK COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRENDA SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?