Cases 91 - 100 of 28,825
CURRY v. IMAN et al
as 1:2024cv06556
Plaintiff:
LAQUANE CURRY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. IMAN, OFFICER A. VELEZ, SERGEANT M. DEHARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jamaine Brown
Defendant:
Lt Fisher, Captain Remarkiwitcz, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergman v. Corfman et al
as 3:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
Sean M Bergman
Defendant:
L. Corfman, Kristen Mitchell, C. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv06509
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B. CONNER
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Barber
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1972
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and CHRISTOPHER SZCZYGIEL, F.B.I. Special Agent
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
