Cases 11 - 20 of 25,820
Jones #347223 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Petitioner:
LC Jones, III
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Burks-Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Burks-Jones, Dr. R. Martinez, MD, N.P. Devers and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
YAKENSKI STEVENS
Respondent:
JOSHUA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. ARMFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv02553
Petitioner:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
JAMES ARMFIELD, AL MILES, WILBUR JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Dixon
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Derick Levell Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, FDC Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Brittany Jones
Defendant:
Russ Skinner, Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. WHITE et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
J WHITE and Y JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
