Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 25,811
(HC) McClintock v. Jones We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01599
Petitioner: John Scott McClintock
Respondent: Gena Jones and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff: Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant: Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner: Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent: Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner: Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent: Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephenson Smith v. Ted Jackson, et al
as 24-11826
Plaintiff: STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Defendant: TED JACKSON, OFFICER JONES and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Smith v. Clophat et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff: Herman Lee Smith
Defendant: Jean Joseph Clophat and Inmate Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Joseph et al
as 6:2024cv01019
Plaintiff: Herman Lee Smith
Defendant: Clophat Peun Joseph and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: Norman Hampton
Defendant: Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Norman Hampton
Defendant: Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant: OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?