Cases 41 - 50 of 31,860
Lammers v. County of Phelps NE et al
as 8:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jess T. Lammers
Defendant:
County of Phelps NE, Phelps County Corrections and Penny Gregg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Reed
as 24-30329
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
P. Reed, Captain, Joseph Westbrook, Master Sergeant, Unknown Scott, Sergeant and others
James Roberts v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11688
Petitioner:
JAMES T. ROBERTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hayes v. State of Idaho
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv14163
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Officer J. Miller, Sergeant V. Maldonado, Officer T. Rueda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01541
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seibert, Jerrad v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Jerrad T. Seibert
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
