Cases 41 - 50 of 11,756
Terry v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02373
Petitioner:
Princess Terry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. Banister et al
as 4:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
Terri Banister, Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Turner
as 1:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
Terry Terrell Pace
Defendant:
Roland Y. Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Trevione James Terry
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barker v. Henzie et al
as 1:2024cv04507
Plaintiff:
Terry Barker
Defendant:
Marlene Henzie, E. Aguinaldo and H. Bruckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mackey v. Rudd, et al.
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Terry Mackey
Defendant:
Rudd, K. Ram, Sgt. Mix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
British Moss v. Cary Dobson, et al
as 24-11845
Plaintiff:
BRITISH D. MOSS
Defendant:
CARY DOBSON, Sergeant, Miami-Dade Corrections, in her official capacity, ANGELA LAWRENCE, Captain, Miami-Dade Corrections, in her official capacity, TAMARA KEY, Supervisor, T.G.K., in her official capacity and others
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
Gordon v. DeLucchi et al
as 4:2024cv03267
Plaintiff:
Terry Gordon
Defendant:
Paul A. DeLucchi, David Bryden, Deputy Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terri McGuire-Mollica v. Richard Griffin, et al
as 24-11081
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
RICHARD GRIFFIN, XINYU LI and SHARON BAILEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
