Cases 41 - 50 of 113,877
Malcolm Carpenter v. USA
as 24-2009
Petitioner:
MALCOLM CARPENTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Taylor
as 24-6114
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TERRENCE MICHAEL TAYLOR
Taylor v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00994
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lee Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Falkowski v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Falkowski
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAHID v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 1:2024cv06997
Plaintiff:
GARY SHAHID and Stanley Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Little v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv01083
Petitioner:
Michael Dexter Little
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Ervin Singleton, Erwin Debinion Singleton, Ervin Debinion Singleton and others
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LITTLE v. USA
as 3:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
BRYAN SHAMAR LITTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Jose Catalan-Avila.
as 1:2024cv04825
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Catalan-Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Givens v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
