Cases 51 - 60 of 28,805
Gonzales v. Swanson
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Antonio B Gonzales
Defendant:
Mark Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Smith v. B. Eischen
as 24-2148
Petitioner:
Darrell Smith
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen, FPC Duluth
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grice v. Dawson et al
as 8:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Chad L. Grice
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Dawson, Assistant Warden B. Walden, Assistant Warden P. Catalano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Michael R. Spengler v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv04759
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler, Jr.
Defendant:
CDCR, Does 1-10, Officers of B Yard Building 1, Does 1-10, Medical Administration and Doctor of Control of B Yard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Self, Carl v. Cromwell, Dan et al
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Carl F. Self
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell, Timothy Thomas, Anna Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dietz v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Larry B. Dietz
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
