Cases 1 - 10 of 44,922
Lanham v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Levi Lanham
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Corporation, Anthony Booher, Correctional Officer Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gude v. Does
as 4:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Corey Gude
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dildy v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv03612
Plaintiff:
Leangelo Dildy
Defendant:
City of North Charleston, John Doe, Jared Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clincy v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Trevon Marquise Clincy
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Attaway v. Glover et al
as 3:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
C/O Glover, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
John U. Singleton
Defendant:
G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Nestor Medina
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Felicia Adkins, Dr J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirchner v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirchner
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
