Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Brodsky et al v. Neiman Marcus Group Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02680
Defendant:
Bergdorf Goodman Inc, Capital One Bank USA, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Brodsky and Donna Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. George
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Defendant:
Dennis Alan George
Shabnam Mehr v. Capital One Bank USA N.A.
as 8:2018cv01576
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. and Capital One Bank USA N.A.
Plaintiff:
Shabnam Mehr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dress v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 1:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
David Dress
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Johnson
as 4:2017cv01484
Plaintiff:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Defendant:
Douglas D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Annamalai v. Discover Financial Services Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00558
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai
Defendant:
Discover Financial Services Inc, David Nelms, Jerome Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alderink v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv11139
Plaintiff:
Robert Alderink
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Stites & Harbison, PLLC v. Citibank N.A. et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00379
Plaintiff:
Stites & Harbison, PLLC
Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. and Thelma E. Humphrys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boaziz v. Torati et al
as 1:2014cv08024
Plaintiff:
Mordechai Boaziz
Defendant:
Hezi Torati , Amerevision Capital, LLC , Joshua S. Lee, Esq. and others
Counter_claimant:
Joshua S. Lee, Esq. , Amerevision Capital, LLC and Hezi Torati
Counter_defendant:
Mordechai Boaziz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ac Diversity-Account Receivable
Daniel Dapice v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 2:2014cv06961
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Doe
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dapice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
