Cases 11 - 20 of 690
United States of America v. 0.10 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in the City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Bernice Culmore, Maxwell Culmore, Jr., Joseph Culmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
St. Louis, Missouri, City of et al v. Culmore et al
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
St. Louis, Missouri, City of and Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Defendant:
Bernice Culmore, Maxwell Culmore, Jr., Joseph Culmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right -of-Way over 1.95 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Loudon County Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right -of-Way over 1.95 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Loudon County Tennessee, Joseph A. Hollingsworth, Jr. and Maddox Trustee, LLC, as Trustee of Maddox Family Properties Irrevocable Trust, Dated October 21, 2010
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over 5.82 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Loudon County Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way over 5.82 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Loudon County Tennessee, I-40/75 Business Park, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, Southeast Bank, a Tennessee Banking corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Jamie Burns
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2028 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, MD 21217
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK), National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Amtrak
Defendant:
Betty Ward, WMC Mortgage Corp., Draper & Goldberg, PLLC a/k/a Draper& Goldberg, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
United States of America v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.37 acre of Land, More or Less, and additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Clinton County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.37 acre of Land, More or Less, and additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Clinton County, Kentucky, Luther C. Conner, Jr. and Susan Conner
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Actions re: rights of Tennessee Valley Authority
Axcella Building Realty Trust et al v. Thompson
as 4:2023cv40151
Plaintiff:
Axcella Building Realty Trust and Richard W Porter Jr
Defendant:
Michael Thompson
Manning v. USDA Rural Area Development
as 6:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Author J. Manning, Jr.
Defendant:
USDA Rural Area Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant:
Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Northern Natural Gas Company v. Lounsbury et al
as 4:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Defendant:
Benjamin Lee Lounsbury, Jean Ann Lounsbury, Big Run Farms, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
