Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States of America v. Clark et al
as 5:2022cv00884
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Adrian Vaughn Clark, II, Bartie Lee Clark Scott, Deborah Louise Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 831 dd - Land Condemnation
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant: 1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 3 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00108
Defendant: Donald R. Pope, Unknown Heirs of Polly Ann Fox Jackson, Betty Hall Ishmael and others
Plaintiff: United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00029
Defendant: Elnora L Deer, Sally Arlene Mann, Barbara Judkins and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant: Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Defendant: Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A, Agnes E. Poe, Elizabeth A. Jordan and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv00569
Plaintiff: E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C
Defendant: Charlie Ray Williams, Lisa Brown Brown, 20 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located in Bienville Parish, Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Property Interests Necessary to Conduct Gas Storage Operations in the Oriskany Sandstone Subterranean Geological Formation Beneath Properties Located in Steuben County Owned by Bar-B-R Farms, Inc. (Ta et al
as 6:2009cv06094
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant: Property Interests Necessary to Conduct Gas Storage Operations in the Oriskany Sandstone Subterranean Geological Formation Beneath Properties Located in Steuben County Owned by Bar-B-R Farms, Inc., Hanley & Bird, Inc. and Bar-B-R Farms, Inc. (Tax Map 285-1-15.11), Curt R. Williamson and Roger Williamson (Tax Map 267-1-8) and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property None
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Land et al
as 5:2008cv00741
Plaintiff: Tennessee Valley Authority, Tennessee Valley Authority, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant: Land, James E Freeman and Michael K Hawkins
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. .40 acre of permanent easement located in Pinal County et al
as 2:2007cv02395
Plaintiff: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant: .40 acre of permanent easement located in Pinal County, 2.54 acres of temporary construction easement located in Pinal County, 2.58 acres of fee property for a meter station located in Pinal County and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?