Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Boyles et al v. Department of Children and Families
as 1:2024cv10902
Plaintiff:
Hakim Boyles and Aiesha Boyles
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families and Boston Police C-11
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James Nanney v. David Boyle
as 23-6852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DAVID NANNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BOYLE, Counsel of Record
Nanney v. Boyle
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
James David Nanney
Defendant:
David Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
MATTHEW SEROTA v. JANOSIK et al
as 2:2021cv00684
Defendant:
ELEANOR JANE CHECK, MICHAEL JANOSIK, DONNA FISHER and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SEROTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEROTA v. NEWELL et al
as 2:2021cv00686
Defendant:
ROSE LEPRI, DOMENIC MEDINA, CATHERINE NEWELL and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SEROTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv02958
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Rebecca Rutherford, Ada Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Godbey et al
as 3:2019cv02963
Defendant:
Irma Carri, Rebecca Rutherford, Ada Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. Immediate Credit Recovery et al
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Kako Mires, Aldrika Boyle and Immediate Credit Recovery
Plaintiff:
Vincent Alonzo Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyle v. DeWolf
as 13-1945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James F. Boyle, New York State Superintendant of Schools
Defendant - Appellee:
Gerard John DeWolf, Esq., individually and NYSUT Union, Robert Ruslander, individually and Errors & Omissions insurance policy and Joseph C. Teresi
Boyle v. DeWolf et al
as 7:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
James F. Boyle
Defendant:
Gerard John DeWolf, Esq., Robert Ruslander, Esq. and Joseph C. Teresi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
