Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Paro v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Adam Paro
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hawley v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Adam Hawley
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Adams v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2022cv02952
Plaintiff:
Wade Adams
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Saylor v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2021cv02328
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Plaintiff:
Adam Saylor
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hill v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Adam L Hill
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Love v. United States Postal Services et al
as 3:2020cv00786
Defendant:
United States Postal Services, A.B. Adams, Love Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Devine Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Corporation
as 2:2020cv00774
Defendant:
The New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Corporation and New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Corporation
Plaintiff:
Zachery Adams
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Nowicki v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2019cv06209
Plaintiff:
Adam Nowicki
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Nowicki v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2019cv09595
Plaintiff:
Adam Nowicki
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Barron v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Adam Barron
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
