Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Steger v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv02730
Plaintiff:
Glen Steger
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Bugos v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2023cv05271
Plaintiff:
Glen T Bugos
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Smith v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Glen R. Smith
Defendant:
Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. doing business as Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Riccitelli v. Metro-North Railroad Company
as 3:2020cv01311
Plaintiff:
Glen Riccitelli
Defendant:
Metro-North Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cotton et al v. Walden et al
as 2:2019cv00901
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc, Jerry Glen Walden and Christopher Thomas James
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Cotton and Keith Richard Cotton
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Glen v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 4:2018cv13393
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Nelson Glen and Glen Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jake King Doody v. Jo Anne B Barnhart et al
as 2:2014cv02783
Defendant:
Jo Anne B Barnhart, Trevor Gonzalez, Glen Poshard and others
Plaintiff:
Jake King Doody
Patrell Barnett v. New Jersey Transit Corp
as 14-1281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRELL BARNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORP, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC, JOHN CALIA, Locomotive Engineer and others
McClendon v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00712
Plaintiff:
Glen McClendon
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Prescott v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Glen B. Prescott, Jr.
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
