Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Figueroa v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv07849
Plaintiff:
Luis Rafael Figueroa, Jr.
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department Of Justice and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Marshall v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 4:2020cv09360
Plaintiff:
Denise Marshall
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARSHALL v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 1:2019cv03432
Plaintiff:
DENISE MARSHALL
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 2
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2017cv03715
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE , MICHAEL STILES , TIMOTHY SUSANIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service , Michael Stiles , Timothy Susanin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Hampton et al
as 4:2016cv00076
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Campbell
Respondent:
Sharon Hampton, Barbra Johnson, Anthony Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Savage et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv02328
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America, d/b/a Federal Bureau of Investigation, Memphis Safe Streets Task Force
Plaintiff:
Donovan Jarrvez Savage and Candace Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moody v. Eccoffey et al
as 5:2015cv05015
Plaintiff:
Vernon Moody
Defendant:
Robert Eccoffey, Harold Compton, Fred Marshall Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little v. U.S. Marshals Office
as 1:2014cv01718
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Little
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little v. U.S. Marshal Office
as 1:2013cv03851
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Little
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
