Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Giard-Campanelli v. Keolis Commuter Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Tammy Giard-Campanelli
Defendant:
Keolis Commuter Services, LLC, National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MUHAMMAD-WHITESIDE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
TAMMY MUHAMMAD-WHITESIDE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
ARROYO et al v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATION, INC.
as 2:2022cv04147
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ARROYO, RAYMOND BYERS, TAMMY MUHAMMAD-WHITESIDE and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Smith v. MTA Metro-North Railroad
as 1:2019cv06831
Defendant:
MTA Metro-North Railroad
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Chilson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2019cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tammy Chilson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Tammy Bell v. Jon Thornburg
as 13-30155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMMY BELMON BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JON C. THORNBURG
Bell v. Thornburg
as 1:2012cv00844
Plaintiff:
Tammy Belmon Bell
Defendant:
Jon C Thornburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Valentino v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2011cv10423
Plaintiff:
Giani Sarah Valentino
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Tammy A. Follensbee and VISN One Regional Counsel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Wilson et al v. Brown et al
as 4:2008cv03666
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wilson and Tammy Wilson
Defendant:
Tracy Lynn Brown, Pansy Parks and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carr v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2008cv00595
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Carr
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
