Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Rogers v. Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01020
Plaintiff:
Leonard Rogers
Defendant:
Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc. , Graco, Inc. , Nibco, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Graco, Inc. , Nibco, Inc. and Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Jones v. Vi-Jon, et al
as 3:2017cv00584
Plaintiff:
Maria Jones
Defendant:
Vi-Jon and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez et al v. VI Acquisitions, LLC
as 5:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Josue Lopez , Maricela Ozona and Maria Del Rosario Lopez
Defendant:
VI Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reichle et al v. PFL VI, LLC et al
as 0:2014cv62166
Plaintiff:
William Reichle and Denise Reichle
Defendant:
PFL VI, LLC and TPG Hospitality, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dayton v. Vi-Jon, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01395
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dayton
Defendant:
Vi-Jon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keeler v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 5:2011cv04061
Plaintiff:
Estate of Hessel Ray Roorda, VI
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRISS v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2011cv02730
Plaintiff:
VI CRISS
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ledet v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Randy Ledet
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc. , Alza Corporation and Entity Does I through VI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Surma v. Mylan Inc et al
as 0:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Deborah Surma
Defendant:
Mylan Inc , Mylan Technologies Inc , Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Mylan, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ruby Harris
Defendant:
Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Entity Does I through VI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
